Mithrandir Metrics
Fangorn 2026-07-17 Refreshed Jul 17 06:00 AM ET
Section III · Betting · Hits

Hits · Fangorn.

Contact volume, lineup status, and market context for hitter hit props.

Rows
20
Date
2026-07-17
Lane
Fangorn
HITS 2026-07-17 · saved artifact ROWS 20 FILTERS lineup default on when confirmed lineups exist
Edges are provisional — model still calibrating This market's model lanes don't yet have enough graded results to validate edges. Treat the gaps below as early model signal, not settled edges.
Lane Health 2026-07-17
Palantir 137 props Brier 0.153 ECE 0.025 sample building
Fangorn tracking in progress (0 logged)
Valinor tracking in progress (0 logged)

Model Lane

Hits

Choose which Mithrandir probability lane drives this board. The URL stores the selected lane, so links stay shareable.

Lineup filter defaults on. Rows hide players not confirmed in the lineup when lineup data is available. Positive gaps require context. Gaps below 2pp are treated as noise; 5pp is consensus, 6-10pp is soft consensus, and above 10pp is disagreement. Young players are labeled. Hitters under 50 MLB AB or pitchers under 20 MLB IP carry limited-sample context.
Hits board
#PlayerMatchupThree lanesLineModelMarketGap PropHits projLine probPARecentPitch mix Best line
01
MIL vs MIA
P 3.1
F 2.0 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Under 0.5
1 of 2
98.0%Under prob · Fangorn 25.6%no-vig -- 1+ Hitline0.355count98.0%selected1.53role--form--fit FanDuel 190 avg 1 books
02
TEX vs ATL
P 98.0
F 98.0 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Under 0.5
1 of 2
2.0%Under prob · Fangorn 47.6%no-vig -- 1+ Hitline0.214count2.0%selected1.25role--form--fit FanDuel 600 avg 1 books
03
MIL vs MIA
P 11.1
F 9.3 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Under 0.5
1 of 2
90.7%Under prob · Fangorn 37.0%no-vig -- 1+ Hitline0.621count90.7%selected3.39role--form--fit FanDuel 340 avg 1 books
04
TEX vs ATL
P 18.9
F 16.5 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Under 1.5
2 of 2
83.5%Under prob · Fangorn 68.8%no-vig -- 2+ Hitsline0.821count83.5%selected4.26role--form--fit FanDuel 220 avg 1 books
05
ATL vs TEX
P 25.7
F 25.7 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Under 1.5
2 of 2
74.4%Under prob · Fangorn 63.0%no-vig -- 2+ Hitsline0.988count74.4%selected3.84role--form--fit FanDuel 170 avg 1 books
06
TEX vs ATL
P 18.3
F 18.3 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Under 1.5
2 of 2
81.7%Under prob · Fangorn 72.2%no-vig -- 2+ Hitsline0.806count81.7%selected3.7role--form--fit FanDuel 260 avg 1 books
07
ATL vs TEX
P 28.6
F 28.0 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Under 1.5
2 of 2
72.0%Under prob · Fangorn 62.3%no-vig -- 2+ Hitsline1.057count72.0%selected4.05role--form--fit FanDuel 165 avg 1 books
08
PIT vs CLE
P 20.5
F 19.9 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Under 1.5
2 of 2
80.1%Under prob · Fangorn 70.6%no-vig -- 2+ Hitsline0.861count80.1%selected4.1role--form--fit FanDuel 240 avg 1 books
09
PIT vs CLE
P 24.6
F 22.2 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Under 1.5
2 of 2
77.8%Under prob · Fangorn 66.7%no-vig -- 2+ Hitsline0.963count77.8%selected3.91role--form--fit FanDuel 200 avg 1 books
10
PIT vs CLE
P 17.6
F 15.2 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Under 1.5
2 of 2
84.8%Under prob · Fangorn 73.7%no-vig -- 2+ Hitsline0.788count84.8%selected3.98role--form--fit FanDuel 280 avg 1 books
11
PIT vs CLE
P 21.0
F 22.8 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Under 1.5
2 of 2
77.2%Under prob · Fangorn 72.2%no-vig -- 2+ Hitsline0.875count77.2%selected3.96role--form--fit FanDuel 260 avg 1 books
12
ATL vs TEX
P 28.1
F 28.7 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Over 0.5
1 of 2
28.7%Over prob · Fangorn 63.6%no-vig -- 1+ Hitline1.045count28.7%selected4.24role--form--fit FanDuel 330 avg 1 books
13
TEX vs ATL
P 21.2
F 21.2 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Under 1.5
2 of 2
78.8%Under prob · Fangorn 74.4%no-vig -- 2+ Hitsline0.874count78.8%selected4.67role--form--fit FanDuel 290 avg 1 books
14
MIL vs MIA
P 20.2
F 18.4 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Under 1.5
2 of 2
81.6%Under prob · Fangorn 76.2%no-vig -- 2+ Hitsline0.854count81.6%selected3.65role--form--fit FanDuel 320 avg 1 books
15
TEX vs ATL
P 18.9
F 21.3 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Under 1.5
2 of 2
78.7%Under prob · Fangorn 78.3%no-vig -- 2+ Hitsline0.822count78.7%selected4.21role--form--fit FanDuel 360 avg 1 books
16
ATL vs TEX
P 29.1
F 27.9 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Under 1.5
2 of 2
72.1%Under prob · Fangorn 68.8%no-vig -- 2+ Hitsline1.068count72.1%selected4.41role--form--fit FanDuel 220 avg 1 books
17
ATL vs TEX
P 31.2
F 32.4 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Over 0.5
1 of 2
32.4%Over prob · Fangorn 69.7%no-vig -- 1+ Hitline1.119count32.4%selected4.74role--form--fit FanDuel 230 avg 1 books
18
MIL vs MIA
P 29.5
F 31.9 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Over 1.5
2 of 2
31.9%Over prob · Fangorn 27.8%no-vig -- 2+ Hitsline1.079count31.9%selected4.62role--form--fit FanDuel 260 avg 1 books
19
MIL vs MIA
P 29.1
F 28.5 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Under 1.5
2 of 2
71.5%Under prob · Fangorn 69.7%no-vig -- 2+ Hitsline1.07count71.5%selected4.45role--form--fit FanDuel 230 avg 1 books
20
MIL vs MIA
P 29.4
F 28.8 EXPERIMENTAL
V -- in progress
PARTIAL - 2 of 3 lanes
Under 0.5
1 of 2
71.2%Under prob · Fangorn 29.4%no-vig -- 1+ Hitline1.075count71.2%selected4.73role--form--fit FanDuel 240 avg 1 books